Hiding Crypto in a Divorce Is Easier Than You Think — Here’s How Courts Catch It

Hiding Crypto in a Divorce Is Easier Than You Think — Here’s How Courts Catch It

Hidden crypto in divorce can seem safe because there is no bank statement in the mailbox. The reporting and legal commentary tell a more encouraging story: courts and investigators have several practical ways to find digital assets, and there are clear steps a spouse can take to prepare. This post covers one documented case, the methods experts describe, the warning signs they list, and a plan you can bring to your attorney.

One Documented Case

NBC News reported on a New York woman, who used the name Sarita, who had been married for a decade to a spouse earning about $3 million a year. She noticed the spouse had few visible assets. After roughly six months of discovery, working with a forensic accountant, she found 12 bitcoins, worth about $500,000 at the time, in an undisclosed wallet. She said the investment came as a complete surprise because the couple had never discussed crypto. The article does not say how the case was resolved (NBC News).

A cryptocurrency wallet surrounded by various digital coins

How Investigators Find Crypto

The NBC article and the American Bar Association’s family law committee piece describe overlapping methods.

MethodSource
Exchange subpoenasNBC, CNBC
Device forensicsNBC, CNBC
Blockchain tracingNBC, ABA
Tax and loan recordsCNBC, ABA
  • Exchange records. Centralized exchanges keep records like brokerage firms do, and subpoenaing them is described as the ideal route. Offshore exchanges may be out of reach (NBC News). CNBC reports that attorneys can subpoena U.S.-based exchanges, while records from foreign exchanges are harder to obtain (CNBC).
  • Device forensics. Investigators examine computers and phones for wallet addresses and purchase records, such as ticker symbols in emails (NBC News). They also look for exchange confirmation emails and transfer activity on bank statements (CNBC).
  • Blockchain tracing. Public wallet addresses allow investigators to view full transaction histories without private keys, and public ledgers show transfers even when coins move to cold storage (NBC News).
  • Fiat on-ramps. The ABA article recommends starting with bank, card, wire, ACH and payment-app records to find where dollars became digital assets, then reconciling them with exchange records (American Bar Association).
  • Past paperwork. Past tax returns may show crypto income, and past loan applications may list crypto holdings (CNBC).

NBC’s reporting also describes a case where about $700,000 in monero was found on a MacBook through a command-line wallet, and another where an investigator tracked about $2.3 million moved from Coinbase in roughly 14 transfers to a foreign exchange (NBC News).

Warning Signs Lawyers Mention

CNBC lists red flags: past conversations that mention cryptocurrency, sudden lifestyle changes such as unexpected extra money or a large purchase, and money missing from joint accounts when assets are tallied (CNBC). The ABA article adds signals once a case is underway: transfers after automatic restraining orders or notice of a crypto motion, shifting explanations about lost coins, repeated movement through decentralized exchanges or mixers, and an inability to produce basic records despite prior control of keys (American Bar Association).

What Lawyers Ask For

The ABA article’s sample discovery request covers exchange, hosted, self-custody, hardware, mobile, staking and NFT accounts over a defined period, which its sample sets at five years before filing. It also asks for know-your-customer records, transaction exports, deposit and withdrawal addresses, login and device history, and tax records such as Forms 8949, Schedule D and 1099-DA (American Bar Association). NBC reports that Florida attorneys now list cryptocurrency in standard document requests, and that some request it explicitly in 40% to 50% of cases (NBC News).

Protecting the Evidence

New York attorney Sandra Radna requests preservation of assets at the outset, including computer hard drives, so that evidence is not destroyed (NBC News). The ABA article describes a sample order that bars transferring, swapping, bridging, lending or changing staking until further order, and requires a verified schedule of exchanges, wallets and public addresses within 48 hours (American Bar Association).

Once Crypto Is Found: The Remedies One State Provides

Finding the asset is half the story, and statutes describe what follows. California is one example, and other states differ. Under California Family Code § 1101, a spouse can recover 50 percent of the value of an asset that was concealed or improperly transferred, plus attorney’s fees and court costs, valued at its highest value at the time of the breach, the sale or the court award. If the conduct meets the Civil Code § 3294 standard, the recovery rises to 100 percent. The claim generally must be filed within three years of when the spouse actually learned of the transaction, though that limit does not apply when it is brought alongside a dissolution action.

Apply it to the NBC figures as an assumed illustration. If 12 bitcoins worth about $500,000 were concealed and the same rule applied, 50 percent would be $250,000, before fees. The NBC case was in New York, so this is a statute example and not what happened there.

California Family Code § 2107 adds procedure. A spouse who has served their own disclosure declaration can ask the other to complete theirs, and if that is ignored can move to compel, move to bar evidence on the uncovered issues, or seek court approval of a waiver. The court must impose money sanctions for failures to comply unless there was substantial justification, and a judgment entered without full disclosure compliance must be set aside on request.

The useful step is to compare the disclosure form with the records from the sections above. In my suggestion, a spouse who has exchange statements or a bank transfer to an exchange in hand can ask their attorney whether the declaration lists that account, because a complete declaration is what the statute requires.

Is a Search Worth It?

CNBC reports that forensic experts charge by the hour and that costs rise with the number of devices and the volume of data. It suggests estimating the value of what may be missing before investing in a search, and attorney Sandra Radna says the investigation is worth it when significant amounts are involved (CNBC).

A Practical Plan

  • Tally the household’s assets before filing. CNBC’s tips include gathering information and looking for gaps, including money missing from joint accounts (CNBC).
  • Write down what you know about how crypto was bought. Attorney Patrick Markey calls this central in the CNBC piece (CNBC).
  • Raise any gap between income and visible assets with your attorney early. That is my suggestion, and the NBC case is an example of a gap that led somewhere.
  • Ask about a forensic accountant. In the NBC case, one helped locate the wallet.
  • Plan for the tax side. The ABA article notes that the IRS treats digital assets as property, that transfers incident to divorce generally do not trigger recognized gain or loss, and that the recipient generally takes the transferor’s basis (American Bar Association).

If You Hold Crypto Yourself

The ABA article says parties must preserve devices, seed phrase records, authentication apps and transaction exports, and that courts have treated post-order transactions as violating automatic restraining orders and fiduciary duties (American Bar Association). In my view, listing every wallet and exchange account yourself is the straightforward path, since the same article describes how addresses, exchange records and tax forms can be matched.

My Take on Hidden Crypto in Divorce

  • In my view, the most reassuring theme across these sources is that crypto leaves records: exchange accounts, bank transfers, device traces and public ledgers.
  • In my view, preparation matters more than suspicion. A clear asset list and a timeline of what you know give your attorney something concrete to work with.

Sources

Related reading: Your Ex Already Got Half the Crypto in the Divorce — Can It Still Count as Income for Child Support? and Your Divorce Judgment Says Split the Crypto. Here’s Why That Might Not Happen..

This article offers general information and my own opinions, not financial, tax, or legal advice. Laws, tax rules, and products change and can differ by location, so check current official sources and talk to a qualified professional about your own situation.